Project 1 of 4
Backend ownership · Invoice systems & compliance · Zweidevs · 2025–2026
Tranero
I wrote Tranero’s backend, including its invoice, compliance, and support integrations.
- Role
- Backend owner at Zweidevs
- Deliverable
- Tranero’s backend, four invoice-system connectors, NRS integration, and Frappe Helpdesk ticketing
- Focus
- Invoice management · Compliance · Support
Overview
At Zweidevs, I wrote Tranero’s backend. The work connected account access, subscriptions, administrative APIs, and invoice-management workflows with Odoo, QuickBooks, ERPNext, and Microsoft Dynamics. I also built its Nigerian NRS integration and connected self-hosted Frappe Helpdesk for ticketing.
- Python
- Django
- Invoice integrations
- Nigerian NRS
- Odoo
- QuickBooks
- ERPNext
- Microsoft Dynamics
- Frappe Helpdesk
Public product context
Tranero: invoicing, compliance, and API integration
The invoicing, API-integration, and compliance pages describe invoice creation and tracking, ERP connections, digital invoice formats, and tax-authority submission workflows. Their marketing performance and certification claims are not used as portfolio results.
testing.tranero.com
Visit the product siteScope
Work completed and source material.Scope and evidence
Scope and contribution.
This study describes the backend I owned and the integrations I implemented. The public product pages provide context for invoice management, ERP connections, and compliance workflows. Backend ownership and the named implementation scope are confirmed by me; the application source remains private. The public website is presented as product context rather than evidence of marketing-interface authorship.
Backend ownership: I wrote Tranero’s backend at Zweidevs.
Invoice-management scope: Odoo, QuickBooks, ERPNext, and Microsoft Dynamics integrations.
Compliance and support scope: Nigerian NRS integration and self-hosted Frappe Helpdesk ticketing.
Public product context: the invoicing page describes invoice creation, tracking, PDF/XML generation, and ERP integration.
Public product context: the API and compliance pages show ERP-to-tax-authority workflows; the site currently uses FIRS terminology, while my implementation scope uses the NRS name I confirmed.
Problem
Main technical constraint.Problem framing
One backend, several external workflows.
Invoice management needed to connect four business systems with a regulatory service, while account access, subscriptions, administration, and support ticketing remained part of the same product. Each integration had its own boundary and purpose.
Implementation
4 implementation steps.Implementation
Own the product backend and its integration boundaries.
- Step1
Implemented the backend supporting account access, subscriptions, administrative operations, and invoice-management workflows.
- Step2
Built invoice-management integrations with Odoo, QuickBooks, ERPNext, and Microsoft Dynamics.
- Step3
Integrated the Nigerian NRS service into Tranero’s compliance workflow.
- Step4
Connected the self-hosted Frappe Helpdesk ticketing system to support the product’s support workflow.
Result
A complete backend ownership scope.
My contribution covered Tranero’s backend and the named invoice, NRS, and ticketing integrations. The public site gives reviewers a product to inspect; the contribution map shows my implementation scope without publishing private source or client records.
What I learned
The central engineering responsibility was owning the backend across invoice systems, regulatory integration, administration, and support, rather than delivering a single isolated connector.
